Tag: Jury Research

group of people sitting in a row of chairs acting as a mock jury

How a Mock Jury Focus Group Helps Attorneys Test Case Strength

Posted on | by Peter Hecht

Winning a case requires more than just knowing the law. It’s also about convincing a jury. Attorneys spend months preparing legal arguments, but if jurors don’t understand or connect with the case, the verdict may not go as planned. A mock jury focus group helps attorneys see how real people react before stepping into the courtroom. It reveals which arguments work, what confuses jurors, and where adjustments are needed. Instead of guessing how a jury might respond, lawyers get direct feedback, allowing them to fine-tune their case for the best possible outcome.

Understanding How Jurors Think

Jurors do not analyze cases like lawyers. They rely on common sense, personal experiences, and emotional responses. A mock jury focus group helps attorneys understand what matters to jurors, which legal arguments they grasp easily, and what confuses them. For example, if jurors find a witness untrustworthy based on their demeanor rather than their testimony, an attorney knows to address that issue. If jurors dismiss technical evidence because it seems too complex, the lawyer can simplify explanations. Seeing how people react before trial allows attorneys to adjust their approach.

Testing Case Themes and Arguments

Attorneys often enter trial with key themes they believe will persuade a jury. A mock jury focus group tests those themes in a real-world setting. If jurors react positively to a particular argument, it becomes a central part of the case. If they ignore or reject it, the attorney knows to adjust their strategy. Mock juries also help identify arguments that opponents might use effectively. If jurors express concerns about the client’s credibility or question the fairness of a claim, those issues need attention before trial.

Evaluating Witness Effectiveness

A strong witness can make or break a case. A mock jury focus group gives attorneys a chance to see how jurors react to witnesses before they take the stand. If a key witness appears nervous or unconvincing, the attorney can provide coaching. If a witness is too aggressive, they can work on softening their approach. Jurors pay attention to more than just words. Body language, tone, and confidence all play a role in how testimony is received. By testing witness credibility and impact beforehand, attorneys ensure that key testimony strengthens rather than weakens their case.

Assessing Jury Biases and Preconceived Notions

Jurors bring their own experiences and beliefs into the courtroom. Some may have strong opinions about certain industries, professions, or legal claims. A mock jury focus group helps attorneys spot potential biases that could influence a verdict. For example, in a medical malpractice case, jurors may naturally sympathize with doctors or, conversely, distrust the healthcare system. Knowing this in advance allows attorneys to adjust their jury selection strategy.

Fine-Tuning Settlement Strategies

Not every case goes to trial. A mock jury focus group also helps attorneys determine whether a settlement makes sense. If mock jurors overwhelmingly side with the opposing party, a lawyer may push for a settlement rather than risk a bad verdict. If jurors show strong support for their client’s case, the attorney gains leverage in negotiations. Seeing how jurors value damages is also useful. If mock jurors award higher-than-expected damages, attorneys may push for a larger settlement. If they award less than anticipated, it may signal the need to strengthen the case before presenting it to a real jury.

Real Jury Reactions Matter More Than Legal Theory

Legal arguments mean nothing if a jury does not accept them. A mock jury focus group allows attorneys to see how real people react rather than relying on legal theory alone. Even well-prepared cases can fall apart if jurors do not find the arguments persuasive. Testing a case before trial eliminates guesswork. Without this process, lawyers may enter trial with blind spots. A weak argument may go unchallenged until it is too late. A strong witness may not get the preparation they need. Jury biases may remain undiscovered until they affect the verdict. A mock jury focus group prevents these mistakes.

Get Reliable Jury Feedback with Magna Legal Services

Waiting until trial to see how jurors react is a risk most attorneys can’t afford to take. Magna Legal Services provides mock jury focus groups that help you refine your case strategy, strengthen key arguments, and prepare witnesses for maximum impact. With real jury feedback, you gain the advantage of knowing how your case will be received before stepping into the courtroom. Contact Magna Legal Services today to put your case to the test and gain the competitive edge you need.

a women being interviewed for jury selection to detect jury bias

6 Ways To Prevent Jury Bias In Your Trial

Posted on | by Peter Hecht

Jury bias can lead to unfair verdicts based on personal beliefs rather than the facts. Even jurors who seem neutral may have unconscious biases that shape their decisions. Attorneys must take steps to identify and manage these biases before and during trial. Failing to do so can put a case at risk. Here’s how to prevent jury bias in your trial.

1. Conduct Thorough Jury Selection (Voir Dire)

Ask the Right Questions

Voir dire gives attorneys the chance to uncover jury bias before the trial begins. To do this effectively, ask case-specific questions that go beyond basic demographics. A juror’s stance on law enforcement, corporate responsibility, or medical malpractice can influence their judgment.

Encourage Honest Responses

Jurors may hesitate to admit personal biases, especially in a courtroom setting. Make voir dire feel like a conversation rather than an interrogation. When jurors feel comfortable, they’re more likely to share honest opinions.

Use Open-Ended Questions

Avoid questions that lead to yes-or-no answers. Instead of asking, “Can you be fair?” ask, “How do you define fairness in a case like this?” Responses to open-ended questions reveal more about a juror’s thinking and potential biases.

2. Use Social Media and Background Research

Identify Hidden Biases

Jurors may not always disclose personal views in court, but their online activity often tells a different story. Social media, blog posts, and public comments can reveal opinions on topics relevant to the case.

Check Public Posts and Affiliations

A juror’s memberships, shared articles, or past statements can provide clues about their viewpoints. If a case involves corporate negligence, an individual who frequently posts anti-corporate opinions might struggle to remain neutral.

Avoid Ethical Pitfalls

Attorneys should follow all legal and ethical guidelines when researching jurors online. Courts have rules about how attorneys and their teams can gather this information. Improper research methods can create legal issues and damage credibility.

3. Challenge Biased Jurors with Peremptory Strikes and Challenges for Cause

Know When to Use Challenges for Cause

If a juror openly admits bias, an attorney can request their removal. Courts grant these challenges when a juror’s views could prevent them from deciding the case based solely on evidence.

Use Peremptory Strikes Strategically

Attorneys can remove jurors without giving a reason, but there are limits. Striking jurors based on race, gender, or other protected categories is not allowed. Use peremptory strikes to eliminate jurors who show subtle signs of bias, even if they don’t openly admit it.

Watch for Patterns in Juror Behavior

Body language, tone of voice, and facial expressions can hint at bias. A juror who avoids eye contact when discussing certain topics may hold unspoken views that could affect their judgment.

4. Educate Jurors on Implicit Bias

Explain Bias Without Accusations

Many jurors don’t realize their own biases. Instead of confronting them directly, frame the discussion in a neutral way. Explain that bias is a natural human tendency and that the goal is to focus only on the evidence.

Use Expert Testimony if Necessary

Bias experts can help jurors recognize their own thought patterns. When a case involves sensitive topics, expert testimony on unconscious bias can help jurors make fairer decisions.

Provide Clear Jury Instructions

Judges should give jurors clear instructions about setting aside personal opinions. Written instructions and verbal reinforcement can help ensure that jurors stay focused on the facts.

5. Monitor Jury Behavior During Trial

Observe Juror Reactions

Jurors who appear disengaged or overly reactive to certain evidence may already have a leaning. Watch for changes in facial expressions, note-taking habits, and overall attentiveness.

Request Judicial Intervention if Needed

If a juror’s behavior suggests bias, attorneys can ask the judge to address it. In some cases, the court may issue a reminder about impartiality or, in serious situations, dismiss the juror.

Consider a Mistrial in Extreme Cases

If jury bias becomes obvious and affects the fairness of the trial, requesting a mistrial may be necessary. This is a last resort, but it can prevent an unjust outcome.

6. Leverage Jury Bias Analysis Tools like JuryScout

What is JuryScout?

JuryScout, a service from Magna Legal Services, helps attorneys uncover potential biases through digital research. By analyzing jurors’ public online activity, it provides a clearer picture of their views and potential leanings. Some biases are easy to hide in court but become clear online.

How It Helps Your Case

JuryScout finds patterns in jurors’ public statements, helping attorneys make better-informed jury selection decisions. Eliminating biased jurors from the start reduces the risk of unfair decisions. JuryScout provides attorneys with valuable insights before seating a jury, making it easier to ensure a fair trial.

Take Control of Jury Bias Before It Hurts Your Case

Jury bias can shape verdicts before the first witness even takes the stand. Waiting until the trial begins to address it is too late. Magna Legal Services offers the tools and expertise to help attorneys identify, challenge, and eliminate biased jurors. Contact us today to learn how we can strengthen your case by ensuring a fair and impartial jury.

empty jury Box in a new court room

What is a Mock Jury?

Posted on | by Peter Hecht

Attorneys don’t like surprises in the courtroom. A strong legal strategy can fall apart if a jury reacts in an unexpected way. Mock juries are a valuable tool that can prevent this. By testing legal arguments with a group of people who mimic real jurors, attorneys can see how their case might play out before stepping into the courtroom.

How a Mock Jury Works

A mock jury is a test run of a real jury trial. Attorneys present their case to a group of individuals who represent the type of jurors likely to be selected for trial. These participants hear evidence, discuss the case, and deliver feedback. Unlike actual jurors, mock jurors do not decide a real case. Their job is to provide reactions, opinions, and decision-making patterns that attorneys can analyze. Their responses help lawyers refine arguments, strengthen witness testimony, and anticipate challenges before the case reaches a real courtroom.

Selecting the Right Participants

Mock jurors should resemble the people who might serve on a real jury. Attorneys and consultants select participants based on demographics, experiences, and other factors that match the trial’s venue. This ensures feedback comes from individuals similar to those who will ultimately decide the case.

Presenting the Case

Legal teams present key elements of the case, including opening statements, arguments, evidence, and witness testimony. Some presentations involve live interactions, while others use recorded video. Attorneys focus on delivering their case the way they would in court.

Deliberation and Feedback

After hearing the case, mock jurors discuss their opinions just like a real jury. They debate evidence, evaluate witness credibility, and work toward a verdict. Their discussions provide critical feedback on how an actual jury might think and decide. Attorneys use this information to adjust their strategy before trial.

The Benefits of Using a Mock Jury

Testing Arguments Before Trial

Legal teams don’t always know how jurors will react to certain arguments. A mock jury helps uncover which points are persuasive and which fall flat. If an argument confuses jurors or doesn’t land as intended, attorneys can adjust their approach.

Identifying Weaknesses in a Case

Mock jurors often raise concerns attorneys hadn’t considered. They might find a witness untrustworthy, question a key piece of evidence, or misinterpret a legal point. Attorneys can use this feedback to strengthen weaker areas of their case.

Understanding Jury Perception

Jurors bring their own experiences, beliefs, and biases into the courtroom. A mock jury helps attorneys see how different people interpret the case. This information allows them to refine their arguments to be clearer and more compelling.

Expert Support for Mock Juries and Jury Research from Magna Legal Services

Legal success depends on understanding how jurors think. Magna Legal Services provides industry-leading jury research, offering attorneys the insights they need to refine their trial strategy.

Mock Juries & Jury Focus Groups

Magna Legal organizes realistic mock trials and jury focus groups to test legal strategies with JuryConfirm. Over the past decade, Magna Legal has conducted more online studies than anyone in the world – by far. We have run over 2,000 online jury research exercises, working with over 25,000 mock jurors. Attorneys get direct feedback from potential jurors, helping them anticipate challenges before trial.

Jury Consulting & Trial Strategy

Experienced jury consultants analyze mock jury results, providing attorneys with data-driven recommendations. This helps legal teams adjust their approach, from witness preparation to jury selection.

Jury Research with JuryEvaluator

Magna Legal takes jury research a step further with JuryEvaluator. This advanced service uses nationwide jury panels and statistical analysis to predict case outcomes. Attorneys gain a clear understanding of how different types of jurors might respond to their case.

Refine Your Legal Strategy with Magna Legal Services

Success in the courtroom starts long before trial. A mock jury gives attorneys the advantage of knowing how real jurors might think, react, and decide. Magna Legal Services provides the tools, research, and expert analysis to help legal teams build stronger cases. Don’t leave jury decisions to chance. Contact Magna to get the most effective trial preparation possible.

Jury Profiling: Multiple Levels of Jury Research

Posted on | by Peter Hecht

Jury “selection” does not exist in the United States. Attorneys choose individuals to serve on the jury by “deselecting” from jury service those individuals who they expect to be unfavorable to their side. Identifying and systematically eliminating pro-plaintiff or pro-defense jurors could be your secret weapon in winning a trial.

Traditional jury selection techniques are often based on stereotypical notions about the influence of juror characteristics on verdict behavior. If you’ve ever tried to connect a potential juror’s gender, race, occupation, social status, marital status, age, religion or demeanor to their tendency to vote guilty or award higher damages, then you’ve probably exercised some of these preconceptions. Needless to say, none of these stereotypes has any scientific basis.

In contrast, scientific jury profiling uses empirical techniques and systematic analysis to develop profiles of favorable and unfavorable jurors. In our experience, only multiple levels of research can predict how an individual will approach the case, evaluate evidence, and render a verdict. Statistical profiling ensures that you’re in the best possible position to seat the best jury.

Jury Research Data and Focus Groups

Trial attorneys often pride themselves on their ability to communicate complex legal theories in a simple way. But when you’re living and breathing a case for many months, it is easy for your objectivity to become compromised. Focus groups and other jury research exercises can help fine tune your arguments and begin to identify some trends in jury profiling.

A mock trial or focus group typically involves the observation of small group deliberation, based on the presentation of testimony that closely approximates an actual trial. By analyzing what mock jurors find significant, meaningful or memorable about the case, we can develop early stage profiles about whether certain attitudes and experiences are likely to be pro-plaintiff or pro-defense and helps us to advise the trial team on the effectiveness of their argument and ways to improve.

Mock jury data can be gathered in various ways, including full trial simulations, shadow juries, focus groups and online mock juries. At certain times, we favor some of these methods and/or combine two or more types of exercises in order to gain the fullest data set to prepare for a trial. It depends on the complexity and value of the case.

When gathering mock jury data, it is important to realize that the quality of the findings is wholly dependent on the quality of the methodology: Put simply, you’ll get better results if the research team is well-versed in the nature of advocacy, presentation, communication, psychology and small group behavior, and designs the study with these factors in mind.

Large-scale Juror Profiling

While traditional jury research data is extremely helpful, it is often based on a relatively small sample size, both in terms of the total number of participants and the number of focus groups. Sample size is a key determinant of how much weight to ascribe to research results. Generally, smaller sample size groups should be interpreted with caution since the group’s characteristics may have been the primary cause of the outcome; they are not predictive in the statistical sense. This is particularly important when evaluating damage awards or responsibility allocations, which are the least reliable types of data.

Because of these limitations, we recommend large-scale juror profiling studies. Massive community profiling allows us to validate the initial profiles developed through our jury research, and determine with statistical certainty what types of jurors are likely to favor the plaintiff versus the defense in your case.

Large-scale profiling is a multifaceted protocol. It starts with one or more large-scale community perception surveys, which we administer with the intent of uncovering community attitudes and biases to each party’s respective position in the case. Research consistently shows that pre-existing attitudes are more predictive of verdict behavior than the potential juror’s experiences; and experiences are significantly more predictive than demographics.

In other words, it is not enough to find out what experiences the potential jurors had, but also what they learned from these experiences. Essentially, we’re using big data about ordinary people, such as their social media activity, to develop a statistically reliable verdict-orientation model based on what motivates people to think the way they do.

The impressions we collect allow us to develop and gain a more nuanced understanding of the kinds of jurors who would be more receptive to the plaintiff’s position than they would be to the defense case. Correlated with mock jury data, this can help us narrow down potential voir dire questions to those which we know are reliable predictors of verdict orientation. The goal is to help the trial team effectively identify and deselect jurors who cannot and never will be persuaded.

Final Thoughts

“Almost every case has been won or lost when the jury is sworn,” legendary defense attorney Clarence Darrow once claimed. That may be an exaggeration, but getting even a small edge can turn the tables in a difficult case. Jury profiling can give you that edge — as long as it’s the right type of profiling. Piecemeal small-scale mock juries have less value than aggregated results gathered from multiple data points and deeper statistical analysis.

Just as you evaluate cases in a critical manner, evaluate the quality of the research service used with the same considered eye. Choosing a consultant who applies multiple layers of rigor to their analysis ensures the quality of your data and assigns a degree of much-needed confidence to the results you have obtained. It can make all the difference.

If you’re ready to learn more about Magna’s jury profiling services, contact Magna Legal Services today.

Request a Complimentary Case Consultation >>

Related Articles:

5 Unique Tips to Jury Selection for Civil Cases
How the Pandemic Affects Juror Perspectives
JuryConfirm

Magna Legal Services Releases New “Jury e-Valuator” to Assess Potential Damages

Posted on | by Peter Hecht

Case Valuation Tool Created to Answer Critical Litigation Question: “How much is my case worth?”
Philadelphia, PA, March 11, 2015 — Magna Legal Services, one of the country’s largest jury research, litigation graphics, social media, record retrieval, e-discovery and court reporting companies, has announced the launch of Jury e-Valuator, a leap forward in research methodology for determining case value. Created directly in response to the need for a damages assessment tool that can help accurately assess risk exposure, Jury e-Valuator is a scientific new approach for predicting potential damages if the case were to go to trial.

Traditional forms of verdict searches are flawed for several reasons, the least of which is that the searched case is not “your” case. Verdict searches rely on outdated verdicts that do not reflect current attitudes of jurors or rely on juror determinations in cases involving different fact patterns from your case. Jury e-Valuator, on the other hand, provides damages estimates based on a representative sample of jurors from the trial venue who react to your specific case facts.

According to Mark Calzaretta, senior vice president of litigation consulting at Magna Legal Services, “68% of attorneys either over or under value their cases, meaning cases are continually valued incorrectly because of a lack of pertinent, timely information. Without Jury e-Valuator, in-house counsel and claims professionals are left to two options when assessing case value: asking counsel for educated opinions, or conducting traditional verdict searches.”

Using proprietary methodology and analysis, Jury e-Valuator provides a scientific- and statistically based damages assessment of cases. The results of the research provide damage estimates for different jury compositions in the trial venue. The tool provides with 90% accuracy the potential range of damages if the case went to a trial jury.

Jury e-Valuator assesses risk and value but also reduces legal fees, resolves cases quicker, and helps win better settlements. “Jury e-Valuator not only assesses risk, but can reduce the cost of the overall legal spend because it cuts down on the cycle time of the case,” said Calzaretta.

About Magna Legal Services

Magna Legal Services is one of the largest jury research, litigation graphics and court reporting company’s in the country, providing end-to-end legal support services to law firms, corporations and governmental agencies throughout the nation. As an end-to-end service provider, we are able to provide strategic advantages to our clients by offering legal support services at every stage of your legal proceeding. It is our mission to assure that all of your legal support needs are delivered to you in a high quality, reliable and responsive manner. For more information, www.magnals.com.

Contact
Peter Hecht
Executive Vice President Sales
Magna Legal Services
866.624.6221
[email protected]

[gdlr_button href=”https://magnals.com/press/20150311.shtml” target=”_new” size=”medium” background=”#F37321″ color=”#ffffff”]Download This Article Here[/gdlr_button]