Juror Perceptions of Women Litigators

Jurors not only instinctively pick up on the way in which other attorneys, judges, etc. treat female litigators, but also often hold gender biases of their own, before ever setting foot in the courtroom. Magna Legal Services hosted a virtual CLE, examining the history of women in the courtroom with an emphasis on how past perceptions can influence jurors’ judgement of female attorneys in today’s world. Drawing upon data collected from various psychological research initiatives across the country, this webinar focused on the legal implications of the inherent implicit and explicit gender biases held by jurors. Strategies for combatting gender bias in the courtroom are also discussed.

Watch a recording of the webinar below, which originally aired live on Wednesday, May 12th at 4PM (ET):

Panelists include:
– Elizabeth McBride, Applied Materials, VP, Global Litigation, Compliance and Privacy
– Effie Silva, Cargill, Ethics & Compliance Leader
– Heather Stern, Whole Foods, General Counsel & Senior Vice President of Legal Affairs
– Rachel York Colangelo, Magna Legal Services, National Managing Director of Jury Consulting
– Honorable Sue L. Robinson (ret.), Farnan LLP

Moderated by:
– Monica Latin, Carrington Coleman, Managing Partner

Brought to you by:
– Peter Hecht, Magna Legal Services, Partner & Executive Vice President of Sales
– Lee Diamondstein, Esq., Magna Legal Services, Vice President of Strategic Accounts

Analyzing & Monetizing Construction Defect Claims

Virtually all construction or property related decisions should be made with costs in mind. But some people are afraid of math.

Regardless of whether you’re an attorney, insurance professional, property owner, or manager, you need to be able to focus on the “vital few” issues, and virtually ignore the “trivial many.” This means knowing how much things cost – not to the penny, but rather a reasonable approximation. The best place to start, when working to make smart economic decisions, is on the BIG expensive issues. You begin by chopping a project into logical parts, and estimating the cost of those chunks, so you can see the forest AND the trees. The earlier in the process you do this, the better.

Magna Legal Services hosted a webinar on January 27, 2021 (recording below), which featured expert panelists explaining the framework behind analyzing and monetizing construction defect claims.

“There’s a lot of parties involved [in a construction defect case]. You have to understand the structure and you have to speak the language… whether it’s the folks on the ground or in the board room, you have to be able to do both,” said Paul Danner of Goldberg Segalla.

Aileen Schwartz of Hill International, Inc. says she makes sure to bring in experts early on to prevent dragging out litigation. “I’ve had cases that were brought in and there were no damages against us. If there are no damages, there is no case”, she said.

If the case ends up going forward, it’s important that it is not a jury trial, Aileen noted, saying “nobody on a jury wants to listen to your construction defect claim. They’re falling asleep. You really need a judge who knows what you’re talking about to hear the cases.”

Every party wants to get the case settled sooner to avoid costly and timely litigation. Magna’s Scott Horwtiz said “Magna’s jury consultants are getting involved more and more on the early side of things to test theories and test themes to see if a small amount of money up front could take care of all of this”.

When preparing your case, organization is key. Pete Fowler explained the importance of starting with “a discreet list of issues — whether its one issue, or hundreds of issues.” In conjunction with the list of issues, Fowler utilizes “a sensible list of costs associated with each issue, and a sensible list of all the people who might be involved with each of those issues.” “It gets to be this big horrible matrix,” he added.

Watch the full webinar recording below to hear our expert panel break down these complex cases.

This webinar originally aired live on 1.27.2021

Webinar details:

Panelists:
Pete Fowler, Founder, Pete Fowler Construction
Scott Horwitz, Esq., National Director of Graphics Consulting & Trial Presentation, Magna Legal Services
Aileen R. Schwartz, Senior VP, Sr. Corporate Counsel US & Privacy Officer, Hill International, Inc.

Moderated by:
Paul S. Danner, Esq., Partner, Goldberg Segalla

Presented by:
Peter Hecht, Partner & Executive Vice President of Sales, Magna Legal Services

Learn more about utilizing trial graphics & tutorials for complex cases here.

Click here to view a list of more upcoming webinars & conferences.

Updating & Translating Contracts, Employee Handbooks, Disclosures, Signage & other Important Information

Covid-19 took the whole world by storm. Now more than ever, your communication needs to be up-to-date, informative and accurate — no matter what language it is read in.

To protect your organization from liability, make sure the documents/disclosures that matter most are regularly updated and accurately translated. A lousy translation can open your organization up to unwanted litigation, possibly offend others, or otherwise harm your credibility.

Use high-quality translations for the important stuff:

  • Employee Manuals, Policies & Procedures
  • Safety Protocols
  • Contracts & other Agreements
  • Disclosures
  • Website Language
  • Updates, Alerts & other Communication
  • Signage & Information Posters

Can I trust Google Translate?

Business Insider noted a bizarre Google Translate fail for translating a list of countries from English to Spanish. “Ten of the 30 countries got cut from Google’s version of the list, and for some reason, Honduras is repeated four times, while Guatemala and the United States appear twice”

Click here to read Business Insider’s full article, “4 times Google Translate totally dropped the ball”.

Machine translation engines like Google Translate don’t recognize context and also tend to translate more literally. If someone is viewing your website in another language, are you confident that what they are reading is accurate?

Magna offers post-machine translation review & editing. Our experienced translators will review existing translations for accuracy, saving you time and money versus translating from scratch.

However, translating from scratch will always give you the highest-quality translation while preserving the right context and tone.

Magna Translation Services

Magna Legal Services provides added value compared to traditional stand-alone translation agencies through first-hand industry expertise and knowledge of the specific needs of our clients.

Our translators are all college-educated professionals with extensive experience in legal, medical, technical and business fields.

All Magna translators sign confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements, so your confidential information is always secure with us.

Translation Packages

Save 25 – 30% when you bundle your translation needs with Magna.
Magna offers custom-tailored translation solutions, so you only pay for what you need!

Whether you need one language or many, full translation from scratch or review/editing of existing translations, or a combination thereof — Magna can handle it all.

Please contact your Magna Account Representative or Leo Duran at LDuran@MagnaLS.com for a free quote!

Click to learn more about Magna’s Language Services

Award-Winning Legal Services: Magna LS Voted Legal Intelligencer’s Best of 2020

Magna Legal Services is honored to be named a Best of 2020 winner by the Legal Intelligencer. We would like to sincerely thank everyone who voted us as the “Best of” in Pennsylvania for:

Magna Legal Services was founded in 2013, and to this day, no other company matches its range of services. Magna is the only company with organic roots providing services throughout discovery, pre-trial and trial. When clients talk, Magna listens, and that is why Magna is an ALM “Best Of” winner every year. Magna is there for their clients with 24/7 scheduling and dedicated customer service.

This year, COVID-19 forced everyone into a new virtual world. Magna was able to quickly and seamlessly transition to 100% virtual platforms for its end-to-end litigation services. Completely remotely, clients can continue to hold depositions, arbitrations, meetings, witness communication training, focus groups, mock trials, and other jury research sessions.

Magna’s online research tools, JuryConfirm and JuryEvaluator software completely changed how attorneys prepare for trial. Instead of building products to attract clients, Magna found what clients needed and developed products and methodology to fit those needs.

Everyone at Magna recognizes our client relationships have made us who we are today. We would like to thank our communities for their trust and support. For more information about this contest, and how winners are selected, please visit the Legal Intelligencer’s website.

District of Delaware Pushes Back Jury Trial Scheduled to Be Among First Since Shutdowns

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware again postponed all jury trials last week, including what would have been one of the first to be held in person in the country since the COVID-19 pandemic limited court proceedings nationwide.

Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals LP’s intellectual property case against energy companies Powder Springs Logistics LLC and Magellan Midstream Partners LP, which has been pending for almost three years, was scheduled to go to trial beginning August 3, with a combination of in-person appearances and remote witnesses, but has been postponed indefinitely.

U.S. District Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark of the District of Delaware issued an order July 16 stating the decision to postpone federal jury trials in Delaware at least through the end of August was made as a safety precaution in an attempt to both minimize the large gatherings that jury selection would entail and cut down on travel for those involved in court matters.

U.S. District Chief Judge Leonard Stark of the District of Delaware. Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM

In a memorandum order issued at the beginning of the month, Stark outlined what were intended at the time to be precautions taken during the Sunoco trial, including having witnesses testify remotely and limiting the number of people permitted in the courtroom.

“This is something of an experiment,” Stark wrote in the order, which concluded by noting the possibility of a continuance. “I expect I will follow different procedures in other cases and at different times and I strongly suspect my colleagues (in the District of Delaware and elsewhere) will do things differently than I plan to do at this trial. I am entering this order as the presiding judge in this specific case, not as chief judge of the district.”

If the trial had gone forward, it would have been preceded by only a handful of in-person jury trials to have begun in the U.S. since court systems began determining individually how to address the pandemic. In April, during what may have been the first attempt at a jury trial since courts closed, jury selection for the trial of a man in Ohio ended abruptly when the defendant became short of breath and the trial was postponed.

Federal jury trials have only just begun in Texas, and New Jersey has resumed trials that were cut short months ago, though the state isn’t currently beginning new jury trials. Similar to the District of Delaware, an order was issued over the weekend pushing back jury trials in Florida, which had planned to resume jury trial proceedings Monday.

“By what I can tell and what’s been reported, they’ve all been running relatively smooth. They’ve not surprisingly had a couple technical issues,” said Dan Wolfe, senior director of jury consulting for Magna Legal Services, of the trials that have taken place recently. “In terms of just getting people in and out and things of that nature, they seem to be going fairly well, by all accounts.”

As is the case throughout most of the country, trials are also on hold in Delaware’s state courts, with in-person jury trials not to take place until the Delaware Judiciary reaches Phase 3 of its four-phase reopening plan, though trials that don’t require a jury have been underway. Currently, Delaware courts are under Phase 2 of the plan. On July 6, Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz Jr. extended the state’s judicial emergency and said it’s expected to stay in Phase 2 until Aug. 6 and likely longer.

Wolfe said, based on the trials that have proceeded so far, he’s seen two predominant factors that seem to be key in a court system’s ability to resume trials. First, he said, courts have ensured they have access to a space large enough to hold everyone needed for a trial while maintaining social distancing guidelines, whether that be a large courtroom or a location such as a gymnasium or theater.

Second, Wolfe said, the courts that have been able to successfully start jury trials have been those in judiciary systems with good communication. He said it’s expected that people will be more likely to show up for jury duty if the court system has communicated to them the procedures in place for their safety beforehand.

“People have been fairly accommodating and understanding and appreciative that the court personnel have tried to work really hard to accommodate the jurors,” Wolfe said. “Anecdotally, several people have reported everybody being ‘more patient.’”

Magna recently surveyed 500 people nationwide in an attempt to gain insight on how prospective jurors’ attitudes might have been impacted by COVID-19. While the results of the survey are still being analyzed, Wolfe said 60% of those surveyed said they would be less critical of those working in health care than they might have been prior to the pandemic, while more than 80% said they were concerned about the safety of health care workers who are dealing with the virus directly, and 23% said they, a family member or a close friend has been a first responder who has addressed COVID-19.

“Certainly, (in) cases like medical malpractice cases, it’s that notion of a halo effect,” Wolfe said. “We saw this post-9/11 for firefighters and law enforcement officials, this positive perception. So certainly, we’re seeing that here.”

Wolfe said Magna has also noted that during both mock jury trials and proceedings involving remote witnesses during actual trials, jurors reported approval of seeing people speak via video call, rather than in front of them in a courtroom.

“They actually report a more positive experience because they can see the witnesses more closely, whereas in a courtroom, they might be more distant and it might make it more difficult for them to judge facial expressions and the like,” Wolfe said.

This piece originally appeared in Delaware Law Weekly on July 22, 2020.

Juries in a Post-Coronavirus World: New Lawsuits, New Exposure, New Juries!

This webinar originally aired live on July 22, 2020

We hosted a webinar on July 22nd “Juries in a Post-Coronavirus World: New Lawsuits, New Exposure, New Juries!“, to answer:
– What will juries and plaintiffs’ counsel do in a post COVID-19 world?
– What new lawsuits will be filed…and how will juries respond?

View the video above to hear our panelists discuss the new developments in defending Coronavirus lawsuits.

Moderated by:
Robert Tyson Esq., Tyson & Mendes, Partner

Panelists Include:
Mark Calzaretta, Magna Legal Services, EVP of Litigation Consulting
Richard Fabian, The RiverStone Group, Chief Strategy Officer
Stefanie Milch, Hallmark Financial Services, Vice President
Julia Macias, Sysco Corporation, Manager, Casualty Claims

Produced by:
Peter Hecht, Magna Legal Services, Partner & Executive VP of Sales

Q&A coming soon!

Thank you to everyone who tuned in!
Don’t miss any upcoming Magna webinars or conferences:

Trial Lawyers Strike Back as COVID-19 Fuels Litigation Support Innovation

As the COVID-19 pandemic began shuttering courthouses and law offices across the country, two attorneys who use the litigation management platform Litify told its chief revenue officer, Terry Dohrmann, that the company could become the legal industry’s Zoom—in reference to the video conferencing app that has become wildly popular as people across the globe practice social distancing.

The comments, Dohrmann said, got the company leaders thinking, “If we really are [the legal industry’s Zoom], then let’s act like it,” he said. And with that, the company began to develop its enhanced video conferencing program called Uplink, which launched recently.

The program is one of several litigation support applications and services that have been developed, tweaked or repackaged by litigation support companies in an effort to meet the growing and evolving demands of trial attorneys, as the coronavirus has forced the industry into a new normal.

On the firm side of things, Philadelphia attorney Kevin Marciano of Marciano & MacAvoy said that, as a personal injury lawyer, he rarely had to focus before on thoroughly tracking time, but, with his staff now working from home, he has begun asking employees to start filling out regular time sheets. And to make sure they stay focused on work-related tasks he also asked his workers to download software that keeps track of what they are doing online.

“It gives you some control,” Marciano said. “I actually think I’m going to use it when things get back to normal. You can’t be with someone all the time, but this gives them the ability to work independently.”

The stories illustrate a trend that attorneys and legal tech industry insiders are beginning to see, as the coronavirus is leading trial lawyers to experiment with new technologies and has fueled a wave of innovation from the litigation support industry. According to court watchers, these new trends will likely lead to lasting changes for the legal world once the pandemic subsides.

“COVID-19 is going to be the mother of all innovation,” Peter Hecht, executive vice president of sales at Magna Legal Services, said.

Evolving Demand

Along with a need for new technologies aimed at pushing cases forward in a virtual environment, the new environment has driven a need for technology that helps attorneys tackle the challenges of managing their workforce remotely.

Along with Marciano, several trial attorneys who spoke with The Legal said they have turned to management programs, such as ActivTrak, that allow firm leaders to closely monitor their employees’ online activity.

For Marciano, the technology has been a ”game-changer.”

According to Marciano, the program can tell how long a computer’s been idle, it can take screenshots of an employee’s computer every few minutes, and it can print out a pie chart of all the websites the staff has been on in a given day.

The program not only allowed his firm to keep an eye on their workers, but it also helped the employees adapt their work schedules to what made the most sense, given their family situation, he said.

“You have to be flexible,” Marciano said. “It’s hard, but people are adjusting.”

Philadelphia attorney Jon Ostroff of Ostroff Law said he has also been exploring ways to monitor his employees remotely, and has been using a Voice Over Internet Phone system as a way to keep his workers connected remotely. The system, which he said is more secure than Zoom, can allow staff to set up chatrooms for the various internal groups that need to stay in constant contact, such as pre-litigation paralegals. It has also helped the staff hold regular office-wide meetings, which he said is a big part of maintaining firm culture.

“We don’t want people to be isolated. Part of what works in our office is our culture,” he said.

Echoing sentiments expressed by others, Ostroff said he is exploring ways to allow his staff to continue working remotely, even after the pandemic has passed. Specifically, he said he was considering the idea of having work stations, which attorneys could use on the rotating basis, only coming into the office two or three days each week.

“We are so pleased with the way working remotely has gone, we’re not going to stop with this. We’re absolutely going to set up ourselves to be a virtual firm,” Ostroff said.

‘Something’s Going to Stick’

Magna Legal Services recently launched JuryConfirm 2020, which expands the company’s online capabilities for handling focus groups and mock trials, allowing for multi-day online sessions.

The program, which revamps the company’s existing JuryConfirm platform, was already in the works before the COVID-19 pandemic hit, but according to Hecht, the program dovetails perfectly into the shifting needs of the trial bar.

Along with the JuryConfirm2020 program, he said, the company is working to marry existing services with the trial bar’s emerging needs. For instance, he said the company has started offering expanded virtual deposition services, which include a jury consulting technician who can handle all the exhibits.

Several attorneys who spoke with The Legal said that one of the downsides of virtual depositions is that, with big files having to be sent beforehand, attorneys often lose the element of surprise. According to Hecht, the company’s newer services are aimed at addressing those concerns, among others, and with the programs becoming more like the live thing, attorneys are going to increasingly rely on these devices, growing the demand even further.

“I think the online deposition platforms are going to be here to stay. So many people are just naturally going to say, I want to do this one remotely,” Hecht said. “They’re going to have done this hundreds of times. It’s going to become natural.”

Dohrmann said his company has been almost busier than it was before COVID-19 hit.

Along with launching Uplink, the company also launched in recent weeks a condensed version of its cloud-based platform, called LitifyGo, which allows attorneys to access the system from anywhere, including a tablet or phone.

Attorneys, he said, are increasingly interested in finding easier ways to share documents, and to more seamlessly communicate with clients, so his company is finding new ways to use portals for document sharing and adding communication features so lawyers can do things like text directly from the Litify platform.

With so many court systems partially shut down and offering varying degrees of services, attorneys have also been struggling for weeks to stay on top of the ever-changing patchwork of delayed deadlines and filing procedures, and firm leaders, who used to get a feel for the firm’s caseload and progress by walking the halls, have also been looking for ways to keep a virtual eye on what’s coming in and what work is ending. Dohrmann said attorneys have been increasingly looking to online dashboards to help them tackle those problems as well.

“They’re looking for better ways to stay as close as they have been in the past, so it’s leveraging technology to do so,” he said. “Embracing technology, rethinking client communication, those are all definitely what we’re seeing.”

Since the shutdowns, the legal industry has faced unprecedented challenges, and there has been a lot of confusion. However, according to litigation tech insiders, one things is certain: the time is ripe for innovation.

“People are going to pop things out there,” Hecht said. “And something’s going to stick.”

This piece originally appeared in The Legal Intelligence on May 6, 2020.

Ultimate Guide to Jury Consulting